Arge Bilişim
tren
argemas Product Documentation and Evidence Centre — Arge Bilişim argemas

argemas Product Documentation and Evidence Centre

Product boundaries, integration validation, implementation stages, security questions and the scope of published evidence.

Technical buying reference

What to verify before a demo

This page is not a feature catalogue or a performance guarantee. It provides a discovery framework for mapping a manufacturing problem to the right system layer, documenting project boundaries and evaluating each claim according to its source.

Content last reviewed: 21 July 2026

Published product boundaries

The areas below summarise uses published for the argemas product family. Exact scope by module, version and facility must be validated during technical discovery.

MES and production execution

Manages work-order, labour, machine, material, quality, downtime and traceability data in shop-floor context. It does not replace financial accounting.

ERP / MRP

Connects orders, purchasing, inventory, bills of material, material planning and costing to manufacturing data. Coexistence boundaries with an existing enterprise system are defined in discovery.

WMS and warehouse flow

Covers location-based warehousing, barcode/RFID, FIFO/FEFO, receiving, picking and dispatch. Production execution remains in the MES layer.

OEE and shop-floor data

Makes availability, performance and quality losses visible by machine, line, shift and work order. The capture method is validated separately for every machine and station.

Integration validation checklist

Do not accept an integration from a logo list alone. Document the source, owner, direction, frequency, failure behaviour and acceptance scenario.

  1. 1Which record is authoritative in the existing ERP, accounting, workforce or planning system?
  2. 2What data will be collected from PLCs, OPC-UA, counters, scales, laboratory systems and operator terminals?
  3. 3In which direction and at what frequency do orders, BOMs, inventory, confirmations, quality and dispatch data flow?
  4. 4How is data queued, reconciled and reprocessed when a connection fails?
  5. 5Which end-to-end acceptance scenarios will run with representative data before go-live?

Implementation lifecycle

Timing varies by facility and scope; the deliverable and acceptance measure for each stage should be documented at project start.

1. Discovery

Define the problem, baseline KPI, user roles, data owners and system boundaries.

2. Pilot design

Select a line, product family or process with explicit success and stop criteria.

3. Data and integration

Clean master data and validate interfaces with representative data and failure cases.

4. Training and field validation

Test operator, supervisor and management workflows under real shift conditions.

5. Acceptance

Compare reports and KPIs against the agreed baseline and acceptance criteria.

6. Rollout

Once the pilot is validated, expand module, line or facility scope in controlled stages.

Security and deployment discovery

Deployment and security choices must be confirmed during project discovery. Require explicit answers in the contract and architecture document.

  • Authentication, roles and authorisation matrix
  • Manufacturing, enterprise and external network boundaries
  • Encryption responsibilities in transit and at rest
  • Backup, restoration and continuity testing
  • Logging, audit trail, retention and deletion method
  • Updates, vulnerabilities, incident notification and support ownership

Evidence classes and published outcomes

Company-scope figures are reported by Arge Bilişim; outcome metrics are reported by the named customers. Customer outcomes are not independently audited or an industry benchmark and vary by baseline, scope and implementation discipline.

Company-reported scope

200+

Factory deployments

Total deployment count published by Arge Bilişim.

7

Countries

Countries where Arge Bilişim reports active deployments.

15+

Industries

Industry coverage represented by published solutions and references.

2002

Founded

Founding year published by Arge Bilişim.

Customer-reported outcome

Alders

Close to 35% productivity increase

Reported after three years, with live action on production and quality issues.

Melih Ayan, General Coordinator

Source statement

Gülce Tekstil

At least 30% quality and productivity increase

Reported after three years, alongside faster data-based delivery decisions.

Cemal Aysel, General Manager

Source statement

Görkem Giyim

30–40% improvement

Reported eight months into the project, with loss visibility and line balancing.

Fatih Yurdadön, Manufacturing Manager

Source statement

Known evaluation boundaries

  • If only basic invoicing or small-workshop accounting is needed, a lighter system may be enough.
  • If standalone advanced finite-capacity planning is the main requirement, compare specialist APS products as well.
  • If a global parent mandates one enterprise platform, evaluate that platform's MES layer together with local complements.
  • Validate every integration, module and security option for the specific version and facility during technical discovery.

Build your technical validation file

Share your current systems, pilot scope, baseline KPIs and acceptance scenarios so the technical checklist can be resolved during discovery.

Request technical discovery